Labels:book | reckoner | sky | tree | windowpane OCR: 45 The court 10 appeals sought to avoid the import of the quoted pussage from $8850 by labeling t mere dicta' and by expressing the view that this Court "id not examine the effects: ot competing obliga tions under sections 1802 04. Pet. App. The court of appeals was wrong on both counts This Court e[gew} here discussed the statutory framework created iq U.8.0. 1602. 1604 (sec 461 557 -558 and specifically considered whether the statut tes involved in the case, which included U.S. 1602- 1604, could he construed to due process problem by imposing filing deadline shorter than the five allowed by 19 U.S 1621 The Court held that they could not. the Court had cne luded otherwise, could have avoided the con- stitu tional issue just as har Thirty seren Photograohs. The quoted passuge in $8850 ther ...
(.png)
